Section II
Root Canals, Extractions and Mercury Amalgam Fillings
|
|
Root canals
can sometimes make people sick. Even tooth extractions can cause lasting illness if
the cavitations are not cleaned properly.
You may have heard also about the problems associated with dental
fillings. The "silver" fillings in your mouth are actually over
50% mercury. Yes, they are made from one of the most toxic substances on
earth. See the Mercury Amalgam section below for more
information.
Cavitations and Extractions
When a tooth is extracted, dead tissue can be left behind.
This has been known to cause serious fatigue. Cleaning out this "cavitation"
can improve things dramatically. This is relatively inexpensive to do.
I heard from Jeanmarie who wrote:
Frank: I had written to you about candida several times. I just wanted to
tell you what has helped my health immensely. I had my mercury fillings removed as I was going through homeopathic detox which helped a lot, but I
still had this strange potassium problem for 3 yrs. I had two cavitations cleaned out (infected bone where wisdom teeth used to be) and I had dramatic
change in health in first week. My potassium deficiency disappeared, my libido came back, and now my need for synthroid is decreasing!!!!!! It is
hard to believe. DDS said it did not reach into sinuses, and I know you suffer with
sinus stuff; perhaps this is your answer. Please read, "Whole
Body Dentistry" by Mark Breimer DDS. and read chapter on cavitations especially.
Good luck. Jeanmarie
Root Canals
When a root canal is done, the center of the tooth including the
nerve is drilled out leaving what is really a dead tooth. Some dentists say that this dead tooth can become
infected. There is no pain since there is no nerve left. Even small
infections such as this can greatly affect a person's health.
Pulling a root canal filled tooth is
more expensive since
the tooth will have to be replaced with some kind of bridge.
I recently learned of an excellent site devoted to the
dangers of root canals. There are numerous first-hand
accounts.
Mercury Amalgam Fillings
Some people see major improvement after having all their mercury
fillings removed. Most don't get much improvement. So, is it worth it to have your fillings replaced, something
that could easily run over $10,000? This is a difficult question. I
will try to summarize what I know and let you decide.
I had mine replaced and I did see some improvement, though not
as much as I hoped.
I am in no way an expert on this subject. So, why am I
writing this? When I suspected that mercury might be at the root of my
problem, I started reading about it and reading what others on the web had to
say. At first, I was very confused, but eventually I think I started to
make sense of it all. I am writing this in hopes of clarifying this for
people.
There is one site
that has excellent arguments on this. I urge you to go there and read
the page. (Come back when you are done!)
My Mixed Results
I had not been to the dentist in over a year, but I finally made
the appointment and went. I was told that an old composite filling in the
upper right needed to be replaced. (A composite filling is one that is
primarily nonmetallic. There are a large variety of materials used in
composite fillings and some metals may be present.)
I had still been suffering from significant fatigue and prostate
problems. The airflow through the right nostril was significantly worse
than the left.
The dentist replaced the old composite and within two days my
prostate problems improved greatly! There was also marginal improvement in
the sinus problems. The airflow through the right nostril improved and was
now equal with the left. This was from the replacement of just one
filling. The confusing part is that this was an old filling that did not
contain mercury.
I spoke with an MD who is the head of the allergy clinic at a
major teaching hospital and asked if he had seen sinus problems clear up.
He said he had! He believes that this is due to nerve problems that can be
caused by old fillings and not by the toxic effects of the materials
themselves. A nurse at the clinic had also seen improvement from the
replacement of fillings.
I then asked my alternative MD about this. He has also
seen major improvement in sinus problems from replacement of fillings. Now
here is the dilemma. He had seen it in a few cases, but in most cases
there was no improvement.
I decided to have all my mercury fillings replaced after
that. Unfortunately, I saw no further improvement.
Why Does It Cause Problems?
For many years the American Dental Association claimed that
mercury does not leak out of mercury fillings despite considerable evidence to
the contrary. In the early '80s, they finally admitted it does leak, but
contended that it leaks in only small amounts.
Urine analysis was done on people who had mercury fillings and
it was shown that they resulted in a modest increase in mercury output.
The problem is that this only measures the amount of mercury being excreted from
the body, not the amount being retained. It has been shown that
significant amounts of mercury can be retained in the body organs.
Mercury is extremely poisonous. What many people don't
know is that it is also highly allergenic! This may explain why mercury
fillings can cause major sinus problems.
Can You Believe the American Dental Association?
The American Dental Association (ADA) has repeatedly stated that there have been fewer than 100 cases of mercury
hypersensitivity reported in the medical literature. For an example of this, see the ADA's FAQ
on dental materials.
It took me less than 30 minutes to demonstrate this statement is false. I did a search of Medline and located almost 150 documented cases of oral lichenoid
lesions that were caused by mercury amalgam allergy. One study in 1995 alone found almost 100 such cases.
In fact, these studies indicate the amalgam is likely the leading cause of such
lesions that occur in thousands of people worldwide.
How can the ADA make a statement that is so obviously
false? While this fact does not necessarily prove that mercury causes other problems, it does call into question the
credibility of the ADA on the issue of mercury amalgams.
The studies can be found in Medline at the following URLs:
Healing of lichenoid reactions following removal of amalgam. A clinical
follow-up.
In vitro lymphocyte proliferation test in the diagnosis of oral mucosal hypersensitivity reactions to dental amalgam.
The relevance and effect of amalgam replacement in subjects with oral lichenoid reactions.
Oral lichenoid lesions caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam fillings.
Oral lichenoid lesions, mercury hypersensitivity and combined hypersensitivity to mercury and other metals:
histologically-proven reproduction of the reaction by patch testing with metal salts.
Why Your Dentist Can't Tell You
In most states a dentist could lose his or her license for
recommending amalgam removal. Dr. Hal Huggins, perhaps the best-known
anti-mercury crusader in the world lost his license in Colorado for this very
reason. The law in Colorado has since been changed to prevent this from
happening again, but it is easy to see why dentists are afraid of persecution.
This leads to some strange conversations with dentists.
They simply can't answer your questions!
The irony is that amalgam replacement probably helps only in a
fraction of all cases and yet dentists can't tell you this either!
Biocompatibility Blood Testing
There are a variety of filling materials available.
Deciding which one to get can be very confusing. I think I've finally
gotten it figured out and want to relay my information.
Did you know that you can be allergic to dental materials?
Mercury is especially allergenic. Dentists are constantly placing filling
materials without the slightest idea if their patients are allergic to the
materials or not! Since the companies that make these materials don't
disclose what's in them, the dentist doesn't even know what he/she is putting in
your mouth.
Always see a dentist that uses biocompatibility blood
testing. Before getting any kind of filling, have the
blood test done. This will run about $250 and will tell you if you have an
allergy to any dental filling materials. The results come in a booklet
that will tell you which commercial dental materials you are and are not
allergic to.
Note that the test is not perfect. You could become
allergic to a material after it is placed in your mouth, but it is still worth
it in my opinion.
See Clifford Consulting for
more information. They can also refer you to a dentist that uses their
tests.
Pros and Cons of Different Filling Materials
There are enough filling material choices out there to make your
head spin. The major categories of filling materials are: mercury amalgam,
composite, indirect composite and gold. The difference between composites
and indirect composites is especially important. If I had known the
difference, I would not have allowed one dentist to replace four of my amalgams
with composites. I would have insisted on indirect composites instead.
Mercury Amalgams
|
Pros: |
These last a long time and are
inexpensive.
|
|
Cons: |
When placed in a tooth that has not
had a filling before, much more of the tooth must be drilled away.
This weakens the tooth and hastens the day when the tooth will need a root
canal, an expensive crown, or will need to be pulled.
Due to the amount of tooth drilled, once an amalgam has been placed it
may not be possible to replace it with an inexpensive ordinary composite. It may have to be replaced instead with another
amalgam, an expensive gold inlay, or an expensive indirect composite.
Mercury is extremely toxic.
Mercury is very allergenic. Many patients have seen sinus
problems clear up after having amalgams removed. (This does not
happen in all cases.) |
Ordinary Composites
There are a large variety of materials used in composites.
Some of these materials are toxic or allergenic. See
"Biocompatibility Blood Testing" above for information on how to
select a good filling material. Assuming that you are using an approved
material, the following is true:
|
Pros: |
These are only a bit more expensive
than amalgams.
In small cavities, they last just as long as amalgams.
|
|
Cons: |
Ordinary composites are not suitable
for large cavities. Large composites don't last more than five or
six years. Each time a composite is replaced, more damage is done to
the tooth hastening the day when the tooth will need an expensive crown,
root canal or need to be pulled.
Composites are more difficult to place and more likely to leak if not
placed properly. Always find an experienced mercury-free dentist to
place composites. |
Gold
Some dentists feel that gold is the best dental material.
Others disagree. Dental materials are never made from pure gold.
They are always mixed with other metals, some of which may be toxic or
allergenic.
Some people say that up to 30% of people who are allergic to
mercury are also allergic to gold.
See
"Biocompatibility Blood Testing" above for information on how to
select the right type of gold dental material.
|
Pros: |
Some dentists feel that gold is the
least allergenic, least toxic material.
Gold can be used for large cavities and lasts many years. It
lasts as long or
longer than mercury.
|
|
Cons: |
Some people say that gold can be
allergenic and that up to 30% of all people who are allergic to mercury
are also allergic to gold.
Gold is very expensive.
Some dentists feel that gold is too hard and not good for the tooth. |
Indirect Composites
These are a new type of dental material. Don't be fooled
by the name. A "composite" is simply a material that is
primarily non-metallic. There are many materials used in composites.
Ordinary composites are hardened in the mouth. This
severely limits the type of materials that can be used. An indirect
composite is manufactured in a lab and then glued into the mouth. This
allows for far more materials which solves many of the problems that occur with
ordinary composites.
There are a large variety of materials used in indirect composites.
As with ordinary composites, some of these materials are toxic or allergenic. See
"Biocompatibility Blood Testing" above for information on how to
select a good filling material. Assuming that you are using an approved
material, the following is true:
|
Pros: |
Indirect composites can be used in large cavities and can be used in
place of gold. They can even be used in place of gold crowns.
They last as long as gold.
Many dentists feel that indirect composites are a bit softer than gold
and more like real tooth.
They look like real tooth.
If selected properly, they are quite non-allergenic and non-toxic.
|
|
Cons: |
Indirect composites are fairly new
and many dentists don't know how to place them properly. Always find
an experienced mercury-free dentist to place indirect composites.
Indirect composites are just as expensive as gold. |
Mercury Fillings and Children
When an initial amalgam filling is placed in a tooth that has
never had one before, a larger amount of the tooth has to be drilled away.
If a small composite is placed for just a few more dollars, less of the tooth
must be drilled away. This larger amount of drilling weakens the tooth
hastening the day when tooth will need an expensive crown, root canal or when it
must be pulled.
Small composites are only a few dollars more expensive than
amalgam and last just as long.
At the very least, once a large amalgam filling has been placed,
it must be replaced either with another amalgam or with a much more expensive
indirect composite or gold inlay. It can be replaced with regular
composites, but large composites are weaker and don't last more than five or six
years.
Don't place amalgams in your children! Use small
composites instead!
Conclusion
Cleaning of old cavitations from where teeth were previously
extracted is reasonably inexpensive and may produce dramatic results.
Extraction of a root canal filled tooth can be more expensive since it will
require replacement with some kind of bridge, but can also lead to great
improvement sometimes.
Replacement of old fillings including mercury fillings is the
most expensive option often costing upwards of $10,000. It sometimes leads to dramatic improvement, but usually does
not.
If money is no object and you have tried everything else, it may
be worth it to have your amalgams replaced. You should certainly do it if
you have been told you have oral lichenoid lesions. Otherwise, I would
recommend that people go to their dentist regularly and have their old fillings
replaced when needed. Always have your fillings replaced with a safe
alternative discussed above and not with mercury. Never place a new
mercury filling in your mouth.
For reasons discussed above, never place a mercury filling in
the mouth of your child! They weaken the teeth and will hasten the day
when your children will lose their teeth!
References
There are several sites and books from which you can learn more
information:
It's All In Your Head by Dr. Hal Huggins, DDS
This is probably the best book on mercury free
dentistry. There are two drawbacks in my opinion. First, it
lacks information on indirect composites which were introduced just a few
years ago.
Second, it lacks information on the success rate of amalgam
replacement. Sometimes the results are dramatic, but usually there is
little or only marginal improvement.
Uninformed Consent by Dr. Hal Huggins, DDS and Dr.
Thomas Levy, MD.
I didn't like this book. I felt it was poorly
written. I read it hoping it would tell me what materials I should
replace my amalgams with. It didn't.
The book has two authors. Many passages are written in
the first person. The authors often relate personal experiences, but
it is so badly written, that I often didn't know which author was talking
which was important in many cases!
The
International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT)
This site has much useful information on mercury amalgams.
Metals
Discussion List
This is an excellent listserv where mercury amalgam issues
are discussed.
Hugnet
This is the Dr. Huggin's web-site.
| Risks Involved: |
There is
little risk in cleaning cavitations or extracting root canals. See
the different materials for the cons of each one.
|
|
The biggest risk of
amalgam replacement is you might spend a lot of money for little
improvement.
|
| Effectiveness: |
Many people
notice a significant difference within days of cleaning cavitations or
extracting root canals. Sometimes the difference is dramatic.
Mercury amalgam replacement is usually not as effective. |
| Difficulty: |
NA. |
| Doctor Needed: |
Contact Clifford Consulting
for a dentist that uses biocompatibility testing. |
| Costs: |
Cleaning a
cavitation is usually not expensive. Extraction of a root canal
usually requires replacing it with a bridge which can run $500 to
$1000. Mercury amalgam replacement can easily run $10,000 if
replaced with the proper materials. |
|
[ Back ] [ Up ] [ Next ] |